Taken from; An AWB would only infringe on constitutional rights - CNN iReport"** It has come to my attention that a website by the name of INGunOwners - Indiana Gun Owners Community has been confused with the screen name used to publish this article. The views expressed here are purely of the author (an anonymous gun owner in Indiana) and not representative of the INGunOwners website community."
repeat 1860'sGet ready for the confiscations folks
As the owner of various 1911s (designed for military purposes and used from WWI through present day by our Armed Forces), that did not escape my attention.notice they are trying to re-brand the AR from "assault rifle" to "military style weapon"
LOL looks like he just joined a month agoSorry if this is a repost, I just got really excited. Who was it?
Why would someone own a military-style rifle? - CNN.com
If you click to tab "6" at the top it has a quote from "INGunowner"
As the owner of various 1911s (designed for military purposes and used from WWI through present day by our Armed Forces), that did not escape my attention.
Really...if you eliminate all firearms that aren't or never were "military style", I wonder what would be left.
Really...if you eliminate all firearms that aren't or never were "military style", I wonder what would be left.
I would assume that you would have to get rid of all Mauser action rifles, which would be almost all bolt actions.Really...if you eliminate all firearms that aren't or never were "military style", I wonder what would be left.