I will just leave this here and let you voice your opinions.
Fan's Religious Self-Defense For Stun Gun Use | ThePostGame
Fan's Religious Self-Defense For Stun Gun Use | ThePostGame
Failure on all sides, not just from the guy arrested.
Police charged the man with three counts of aggravated assault and illegal possession of a stun gun.
The article is a poor read, leave a lot to the imagination....
I'm guessing he was being a jerk, NYC folks got pissed, shouting turned to pushing turned into more, he saw an opportunity to claim self defense, and used his "stun gun". Sounds almost premeditated to me. Either way I'm sure it was his word against all of the Romans in Rome.
Sounds like either the article has bad info or he doesn't know the law in NYC (Jersey actually I think)
On an unrelated note to the actual story, why the **** is the media so concerned with the "breach of security"... it's not illegal to carry a stun gun.
Your title makes no sense...
He refused to stand for the Anthem and talk talking on his cell phone during the moment of silence and taps then pulls out a stun gun to "clear a path" to the bathroom..... What a douche. He deserves worse than what he got and I hope he's got more coming to him.
On an unrelated note to the actual story, why the **** is the media so concerned with the "breach of security"... it's not illegal to carry a stun gun.
****ed up priorities abound in this link.
I'm curious what you mean by this.
It says he was charged with illegal possession of a stun gun.
Not standing, I don't like it but his beliefs not my call. Can't say I was there that I wouldn't feel pissy, but he is not actually effecting me so it is a get over it situation.
Talking during a moment of silence, that's not "religious grounds" (I've studied a great many and have never found one that says you can't shut your mouth) and that is effecting other around you. Now we have a problem.
Pushing through with a stun gun - jackwagon had to be TRYING to start something.
The new American dream - start crap, claim discrimination, big lawsuit!
The new American dream - start crap, claim discrimination, big lawsuit!
Doesn't matter the reason, there is no law saying you must observe a moment of silence. We as a people cant start trouble with everyone who we disagree with.
I think I might have a new SIG line.
I agree with you, however - he is claim that he doesn't need to observe because of RELIGIOUS reasons. Yes, JW says you cannot salute and discourages showing respect for the flag but even they have moments of silence and remembrance. He not saying that it was his right to be an rude, ignorant, a$$ was violated - he's claiming he had the right to act this way because of his religious views thus he was "justified".
And then turns a stun gun on people for people being rude back to him (not allowing him easy passage out of his seat). I believe the line is "reap what you sow."
There really is no "however" on the first paragraph. Doesn't matter what his reason was, he could have said the pink elephant in his mind told him to do it. He doesn't have justify being a jerk.
Is that phrase stolen from someone else? I think I have seen that on here before.I think I might have a new SIG line.