Guess who Census banned as 'partners'

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 4sarge

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Mar 19, 2008
    5,907
    99
    FREEDONIA
    Guess who Census banned as 'partners'

    Agency seeks out ACORN, but 'blacklists' other groups

    [SIZE=-1]Posted: May 28, 2009[/SIZE]
    [SIZE=-1]11:50 pm Eastern[/SIZE]


    [FONT=Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif]By Bob Unruh[/FONT]
    [SIZE=-1]© 2009 WorldNetDaily [/SIZE]


    The U.S. Census Bureau, reflecting what apparently is becoming a political position that involves more than one federal agency, has listed "hate groups," "law enforcement" "and "anti-immigrant groups" among those that would be refused permission to become a partner with the 2010 Census.

    The news comes in a series of [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]documents[/color][/color] obtained by Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act about the census operations.

    WND previously reported when the Department of Homeland Security released an "extremism" report that warned local law enforcement officers nationwide to [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]watch[/color][/color] out for "potential terrorists" including those who:

    • Oppose abortion

    • Oppose same-sex marriage

    • Oppose restrictions on firearms

    • Oppose lax immigration [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]laws[/color][/color]
    • Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs

    • Oppose continuation of free trade agreements

    • Are suspect of foreign regimes

    • Fear Communist regimes

    • Oppose a "one world" government

    • Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world

    • Are upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India, and more
    At the time, a [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]lawyer[/color][/color] pursuing a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano over the "extremist" report said he was not reassured by her later promise to "reword" the document.

    "She says, 'Well, we're going to reword the document – and we're going to make it more precise,'" Richard Thompson, president of the Thomas More Law Center, told WND. "That's scary because we know they are still going to maintain some kind of targeting for various people that she's never apologized to or never retracted [her accusations]."

    At issue is the agency's "Rightwing Extremism" report called "Rightwing Extremism: Current [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]Economic[/color][/color] and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." WND has posted the report online.

    The report linked returning veterans with the possibility of terrorism and when it was released, created such a furor for Napolitano she has given several explanations for it, including that she would have reworded the report and that it was issued by a rogue employee.

    Are you ready for a second Declaration of Independence? Sign the petition promoting true freedom once again!
    Thompson said no apology had been offered to most of the members of the various groups on which the government was painting a bull's-eye.

    Now come the documents from the Census Bureau, which said it wants to [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]work[/color][/color] with groups that "partnered" with the census in 2000, various other "national organizations" and other groups that "served one of the 'hard to count' clusters."

    The Census Bureau identified those groups as "the economically disadvantaged," "the unattached [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]mobile[/color][/color] singles" and "high density areas with ethnic enclaves."
    The list of banned groups was found in an [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]e-mail[/color][/color] from Barbara A. [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]Harris[/color][/color], the chief of the agency's program for partnering with outside groups, to other staff members. She said the "criteria for NOT partnering with a group" included a failure to have worked with the organization in 2000, to be a national organization or other factors

    Her note then said "hate groups" were not eligible, nor were "law enforcement, anti-immigrant groups, (or) any groups that might make people fearful of participating in the census."

    "This is the Napolitano memo Part 2," Judicial Watch chief Tom Fitton told WND.

    The documents indicate, "there may be an ideological agenda at work, in a discriminatory effort to keep conservatives away," he suggested. "What's a real slander is to suggest that the Fraternal Order of Police may be the equivalent of a hate group."

    The census, he said, should be politically neutral, counting numbers, not political opinions.

    "One can be opposed to illegal immigration and you should be able to partner with the government," he said. "It screams out violations of the First Amendment."

    Census Bureau spokesman Stephen Buckner told WND the list of excluded groups was assembled by Harris, who heads the federal agency's partnership program.

    "Legalize the Constitution" bumper sticker
    He admitted the list probably "unfairly" lists law enforcement officers along with anti-immigrant groups. But he said the choice of groups with which to work is important, because there are population groups who, for example, don't trust law enforcement, or don't trust members of "anti-immigrant" groups.

    "We don't want to partner with an organization that is blatantly trying to exclude one group (illegal immigrants) for one reason or another," he said.

    Bucker told WND the goal is to count every living person in the United States at the time of the census, and "negative reactions" from members of the groups to be counted should be factored.

    However, he declined several opportunities to answer WND questions about the Census Bureau's partnership with groups such as ACORN, whose members repeatedly have been accused of illegal election activities, and whether there are population groups in the U.S. who would react negatively toward activities by that "partner."

    "All we've asked ACORN to do is simply share the word," he said.

    But according to Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, among the 126 pages of documentation obtained from the government is confirmation of the high level of influence that ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, has in the 2010 Census.

    Judicial Watch said the documents describe 18 different areas of responsibility that ACORN asked to be given.
    The Obama administration has downplayed ACORN's involvement, saying the organization with which Obama worked earlier in his political career, would be allowed to "recruit" census workers.

    But the documents show that ACORN also is an "executive level" partner with the ability to "organize and/or serve as a member on a Complete Count Committee."

    The census documents regarding ACORN also show the organization also signed up to "encourage [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]employees[/color][/color] and constituents to complete and mail their questionnaire; identify job candidates and/or distribute and display recruiting materials; appoint a liaison to work with the Census Bureau; provide space for Be Counted sites and/or Questionnaire Assistance Centers, sponsor community events to promote participation in the 2010 Census."
    The documents also show the Census Bureau wants ACORN to teach other organizations about the process, Judicial Watch said.

    "Given its history of illegal activity and fraud, ACORN should be nowhere near the 2010 Census," said Fitton. "And shame on the Obama Commerce Department for continuing to demonize conservatives by lumping together law enforcement and anti-immigration groups with 'hate groups.' This discriminatory policy raises First Amendment concerns. Indeed, these documents provide further evidence that the Obama administration is politicizing the 2010 Census."

    U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, meanwhile, has called for congressional hearings into ACORN's finances that apparently includes a procedure called a "forensic audit."
     

    Dryden

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 5, 2009
    2,589
    36
    N.E. Indianapolis
    Have no fear. ACORN will collect and report only the facts. They will not distort, falsify, or alter any information.
    The proof is in the last election.
    And our government believes them!!:eek:
     

    henktermaat

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jan 3, 2009
    4,952
    38
    I will flat out ask anyone who comes to my door if they are part of Acorn or not. Then I will heap my scorn upon them.
     

    El Cazador

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2009
    1,100
    36
    NW Hendricks CO
    Hmmm, so now law enforcement is an "extremist" group, right along with many of us. That ought to hurt a couple of feelings. Being turned on like that...
     

    tedbower

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 21, 2009
    357
    16
    mooresville
    Last time they came to my door they were told no I will not fill it out, they said you have to , again I said no, they said someone would be back and they never did.
     

    Dryden

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 5, 2009
    2,589
    36
    N.E. Indianapolis
    I will flat out ask anyone who comes to my door if they are part of Acorn or not. Then I will heap my scorn upon them.

    Depending on my mood, I'll probably heap more than scorn on them.
    This census will have no value. The politicians know that... we know that.. so why continue to insist that ACORN do it?
    It's one more slap in the face to those that will cling to their religion and guns.:xmad:
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    "You're with the census bureau? May I see your ID please? Good, thank you. OK, the census is tasked to enumerate (count) every living person in the US at this time, yes? Very well. There are ______ adult American citizens, all naturally born as such, living here. These are our names and dates of birth. Your task is complete here. Move along. Thanks and have a nice day. See you in ten years. Buhbye."

    Constitutional requirements fulfilled. End of problem. If it's not the end of the problem, I'll just repeat it.

    "_____ naturally-born adult American citizens live here, which is more than can be said of the White House. Now what part didn't you understand- the 'buh' or the 'bye'? Buh-bye now."

    At least I hope it goes that smoothly.

    Blessings,
    Bill
     
    Top Bottom