FBI paid Twitter $3.5M

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • JCSR

    NO STAGE PLAN
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 11, 2017
    9,983
    133
    Santa Claus

    indyblue

    Guns & Pool Shooter
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Aug 13, 2013
    3,933
    129
    Indy Northside `O=o-
    the intelligence community has been “reformed,” usually to meet some political expedient. More importantly, since 9/11 our intelligence community has turned inward. Much of its spying, and its many abuses of power, have been aimed at Americans at home, rather than at our enemies abroad. Then–FBI Director Robert Mueller was responsible for turning the FBI’s counterintelligence directorate against Americans.
    The FBI never verified any part of the Steele Dossier, but for more than a year it was regarded as the gospel truth.

    During the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, the FBI falsified at least four sworn affidavits that asked the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to authorize surveillance against Carter Page, a Trump supporter.
    Perhaps the best (worst?) example of politics invading intelligence operations was the October 2020 open letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials (nine of whom remained anonymous and are almost certainly still employed within the intelligence community) who proclaimed — not on the basis of any evidence but only on their collective experience — that the Hunter Biden laptop story published by the New York Post — which quoted several emails taken from the laptop — was nothing more than a Russian disinformation operation.
    “Skewing intelligence to fit a political motive should not be acceptable in any form from a Democrat or a Republican. Intelligence is a national security tool that has no place in the political realm. Misuse of such intelligence should have severe and meaningful consequences.”
    The 51 intel officers — former and current — who signed the “laptop letter” should each be brought in and required to testify before Congress under oath and asked what knowledge they had before agreeing to sign such a letter.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    37,730
    113
    .
    Short of disbanding and starting over how can the FBI recover it's credibility? As time goes by it is looking more like the Stasi than what I think Americans expected.

    Everything FBI in dc should be closed and the organization restarted as 5 or more regional offices scattered around the country.
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    26,342
    150
    Avon
    This is pretty outrageous. Even worse that no one seems at all outraged about it.
    but don’t worry, the GOP Congress will ask some tough questions and express outrage on tv for us.
    And as we've seen with the never-ending Durham Probe, when the low-level wonks do go to trial? It's in DC with a jury full of dem-doners and staffers.
     

    BJHay

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 17, 2019
    591
    93
    Crawfordsville
    There is an outrage a day from our government and people are numb to it.
    Nothing is going to happen to anybody over this.
    At times it seems like half of Washington is under investigation.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    26,159
    149
    There is an outrage a day from our government and people are numb to it.
    Nothing is going to happen to anybody over this.
    At times it seems like half of Washington is under investigation.
    The problem is that people from both parties are so divided they will never become united in the outrage and demand changes.
     

    DragonGunner

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 14, 2010
    5,763
    113
    N. Central IN
    FBI had 80 agents at twitter which was more than twitter had lobbyists in Washington. Folks the British have returned to take our freedoms again. Only this time it’s called our government. Saw Rand Paul going off in the $1.7 trillion spending spree. He said it is an unholy alliance between the GOP and democrats. The democrats want welfare $$$ and the republicans want warfare $$$. So 4000 pages will be passed this Friday with no one able to read the 4000 pages. I saw Mike Braun with Rand also. And don’t forget to fund $$$ to the FBI. As far as credibility for the FBI that was lost forever ago. We sadly need a leader to say…” the British aren’t coming, they are here!!!” Rand said the the worse threat right now is the debt that jeopardizes everything. Spot on. But when is the last Congress or President than ran on that???? Warfare and welfare.
     

    jwamplerusa

    High drag, low speed...
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 21, 2018
    4,744
    113
    Boone County
    The 51 intel officers — former and current — who signed the “laptop letter” should each be brought in and required to testify before Congress under oath and asked what knowledge they had before agreeing to sign such a letter.
    B********! They need to be charged with subversion, tried by a jury of their peers in the middle of the country, and after conviction be offered one of two forms sentencing completion! (rope / wall)

    From the beginning the "Intel Officers" letter was utter c***. Obviously nothing less than an attempt to control the election outcome, by persons who in many cases still held government authorizations (security clearances) and therefore acted under the veil of "government authority". Each one violated the 1st Amendment as a representative of the government by any reasonable standard.
     
    Top Bottom