another idiotic quote from mccarthy

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • tv1217

    N6OTB
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Mar 11, 2009
    10,294
    77
    Kouts
    "The only purpose for the existence of these devices is to be able to shoot as many people as possible as quickly as possible," McCarthy said in the letter.


    Umm duh? When a government becomes oppressive, they don't transform into zebras or something.
     

    esigler

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 15, 2008
    229
    16
    Rio Rancho, NM
    I read the comments under the article there is one person that says he is a gun owner and believes it will help? Even if which it never would stop crimminals, making a deal with gun grabbers is like making a deal with the devil! No gun control ever works, just like prohibition or the drug war big failures! Insanity is trying the same thing expecting different results?
     

    edporch

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Oct 19, 2010
    4,770
    149
    Indianapolis
    By not speaking up when the government sets the precedent of regulating magazine capacity, they can keep lowering to whatever they choose to.

    First it's "nobody needs a 33 round magazine, 10 is enough"
    next it's "5 is enough"
    Then "1 is too many".

    REGARDLESS of whether we as individuals want a high capacity magazine or not,
    we need to stand together or we will hang separately...
     

    elpenguin0717

    Marksman
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Jan 31, 2011
    218
    16
    indy
    whats a stupid trick ....like the other member posted lowering the mag count wont do a thing to stop crime it only takes 1 bullets to end somones life and if the criminal really wants to hurt people even if the mag count got down to one how hard is it to reload?? a couple seconds hahahaha somtime people that think there smart are actully the dumbest ones that dont think things thru hahahaha
     

    bertenshaw

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 16, 2011
    100
    16
    wales uk
    Just to put this into perspective. Here in the UK we have no 2nd ammendment. To own any firearm you have to apply for a "certificate" that is only issued after extensive "checks". You cannot own a gun for the purpose of defense.
    But, believe it or not, you can have a magazine as big as you like !!
    Just shows how scatter-brained our rulers are... they don't know the ar5es from their elbows.
     

    kevinj110

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jul 5, 2009
    989
    18
    home
    So in her proposal how would machine guns work would they only be able to transfer with a 10round or smaller magazine? She seems like a uppity you know what to me. I don't understand how people can actually get up and stand up and say hey I know whats best for everyone. I have said it before and will say it again they will not get mine.
     

    lashicoN

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 2, 2009
    2,130
    38
    North
    Well, everyone knows when you ban item X, all the criminals turn X in and never attempt to get it again. Works like a charm, every single time.
     

    indykid

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 27, 2008
    11,930
    113
    Westfield
    Since murder is already illegal, why doesn't she push for a law to make multiple murders illegal???

    Oh, that clip she is talking about is for the Glock Garand Edition.:rolleyes:
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    Since murder is already illegal, why doesn't she push for a law to make multiple murders illegal???

    Oh, that clip she is talking about is for the Glock Garand Edition.:rolleyes:

    Why? Because that wouldn't allow her to get back at the eeeeeeevil gun that jumped up and killed her husband years ago. It can't be the fault of a single person who committed a crime, and she doesn't get (or care about) the fact that she could ban every gun ever created and even if she was to get rid of every single one, it wouldn't give him one more second on this planet. For that matter, neither would punishing the criminal, but at least that would be a more appropriate response, holding an individual responsible for his actions.

    Blessings,
    Bill
     
    Top Bottom