hornadylnl
Shooter
- Nov 19, 2008
- 21,505
- 63
In retrospect, allowing Afghanistan to have become a SSR, not arming Egypt with F-16s and Abrams tanks and warships, and not doing likewise with Turkey which is turning in an unsettling direction (in addition to invading Cyprus) likely would have been good decisions. Not strong-arming Israel into giving back territory it won in its wars would have been a good decision. Not strong-arming Israel into giving up on taking out Hezbollah when it could have been done much more easily than at the present would have been a good decision. Not strong-arming Israel into accepting peace accords with people who intend no more or less than using them as a reprieve in which to gear up for conflict would have been a good decision (Jimmy, Bill, you hear that?). Not strong-arming Israel into doing little or nothing about rockets being lobbed into its cities would be a good decision. Not strong-arming Israel into doing nothing about Iran's nuclear program in spite of remarkably clear threats regarding the intended use of the nuclear weapons with which Iran simultaneously threatens Israel and denies constructing.
All things considered, we really haven't accomplished much positive for the cause of peace.
Are you assuming that was ever the goal?