I checked that out ,this quote is strange >>>In addition, Haq said, "there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in confiscating weapons from member states."
I searched for such a 'group' and it does exist.
Link?
I checked that out ,this quote is strange >>>In addition, Haq said, "there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in confiscating weapons from member states."
I searched for such a 'group' and it does exist.
Link?
Who controls Politifacts? Whether or not the document is real, I feel sure that this is an agenda that is in play. Our current administration would like nothing better than total disarmament of civilians.
Who controls Politifacts? Whether or not the document is real, I feel sure that this is an agenda that is in play. Our current administration would like nothing better than total disarmament of civilians.
Who controls Politifacts? Whether or not the document is real, I feel sure that this is an agenda that is in play. Our current administration would like nothing better than total disarmament of civilians.
Its increasingly obvious that people have their minds already made up and facts are irrelevant. If something that confirms your assumptions is a forgery, who cares, we all know it COULD have been real, right? Like Bombelli said, it just makes us look like stupid, and I'll add paranoid.
They could gang up on us and they would win, but by time they finally did win, what would they have? A bunch of sheep and rumble? We'd fight back, civilians and military both, and sure they'd win, but what'd they prove? Plus there'd be so much inside fighting between them it's ridiculous.The UN can't over ride our constitution. Well I guess if the UN wanted they could band together and take us over. But enough of us won't let that happen. I don't think that is going to happen.
We all know that. We don't need liars parading around fake documents to convince us of that. All that does is make us look stupid when we talk about it.
All that is, is the plan that The UK and Australia have ALREADY executed successfully. Guns are basically completely illegal, unless you are a farmer--but even then, you can only have a SINGLE SHOT shotgun, AND, it must be locked up, and unloaded, at all times (they come and inspect because they have a registry).
.
Well if they decided that they would confiscate our guns, the us government would have to have someone help them because I doubt the whole populous could be disarmed voluntarily.Setting aside out completely and utterly far-fetched such a scenario is, even if the UN did wish to invade the US it couldn't legally do so unless we agreed to it.
The UN Security Council is the body that must authorize military actions, peacekeeping missions, etc.
The US is a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
All permanent members have veto power. All five (China, US, Russia, France, and United Kingdom) must agree (either vote "yes" or abstain) as a single veto cannot be overridden even by a otherwise unanimous council.
We would have to vote for our own invasion.
Also, given that the UN doesn't have its own troops, who would be supplying the invasion?