Hopefully he gets his guns back
Man Fined $1,000 for Saving Boy from Pit Bull Attack with Unregistered Gun
Man Fined $1,000 for Saving Boy from Pit Bull Attack with Unregistered Gun
If anyone sees a fund set up for him, put up a link. I'll help pay the $1k, and I'm sure I'm not alone on INGO.
Hyperbole does no one any good. He wasn't fined $1000 for "saving a life". He was fined for illegal possession of a firearm. Do we really have to stoop to the level of yellow, sensationalist journalism? We can't be more honest than that and just report what actually happened?
You mean to tell me, that somebodys pitbulls got loose, and mauled a child, but the person being demonized, is the guy that saved this kid??? Those gun grabbers can't possibly see this gun owners actions as being bad.....the only thing they could get this guy on was non-registration of firearms?? I call BS!!!!
Isn't there laws that require owners of animals to maintain control of their animals, and to take responsibility for their actions? If so...where are the owners fines?
They weren't illegal firearms, they weren't illegally possessed, and they weren't illegally used.
He was not fined for saving a kid's life. Period. We have too many news threads on INGO that are titled in a dishonest way for no reason other than to enrage people. You can argue the details of the article all you want, but the thread title is flat-out wrong. You might just as well say "Man fined for having breakfast" or "man fined for walking down sidewalk". Those are equally dishonest about why he was fined.
He hsould sue the owner of the pit for the necessary money. i could only imagine such a deadly animal needs to be registered as well.
He was not fined for saving a kid's life. Period. We have too many news threads on INGO that are titled in a dishonest way for no reason other than to enrage people. You can argue the details of the article all you want, but the thread title is flat-out wrong. You might just as well say "Man fined for having breakfast" or "man fined for walking down sidewalk". Those are equally dishonest about why he was fined.
Hyperbole does no one any good. He wasn't fined $1000 for "saving a life". He was fined for illegal possession of a firearm. Do we really have to stoop to the level of yellow, sensationalist journalism? We can't be more honest than that and just report what actually happened?
I'm sure, and I hope, the parents of the child are putting up the fine money.