Suing the BATFE

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Aszerigan

    Whitetail Trading Co.
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    390   0   0
    Aug 20, 2009
    6,052
    113
    Bean Blossom, IN
    A lawsuit against the BATFE for violations of Second, Fourth and Fifth amendment rights was filed by us in Indiana Federal Court, Southern District today at 12:03pm.

    Also named in the suit were Eric Holder, Jr and B. Todd Jones. Looking forward to seeing them in court.

    Second Amendment Violations: Infringing upon the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms by illegally retaining and not returning property that is legally owned by the company.

    Fourth Amendment Violations: Firearms unreasonably seized and not returned, held for unreasonable amounts of time without charging defendants in our theft case with a crime. (illegal seizure)

    Fifth Amendment Violations: Lack of due process in the confiscation of our legally owned and registered property. Lack of compensation for the seizure of property illegally held by the BATFE.


    Will update this thread as the case progresses.
     

    warthog

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Feb 12, 2013
    5,166
    63
    Vigo County
    God Bless You for this and if I am aboe to do ANYTHING to help the case, paperwork or ANYTHING, please let me know. I am ready willing and bale to help and I am not seeking anything but JUSTICE. I will call and give you my contact information if you don't have it still. I mean it too, ask and it shall be done. :patriot:
     

    lovemywoods

    Geek in Paradise!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    51   0   0
    Mar 26, 2008
    3,026
    0
    Brown County
    Thank you for sharing your legal journey with INGO. So sorry you have to work so hard and spend so much just to have what is yours returned to you.

    Hoping all the best for you.
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Indianapolis gun store sues ATF for keeping recovered firearms

    Indianapolis gun store sues ATF for keeping recovered firearms

    An Indianapolis gun store that was robbed is trying to get its inventory back, but not from the robbers.

    In a handwritten complaint filed in an Indiana federal court last week, Andrew Hall, owner of Profire Arms and Supply, alleges the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives will not return firearms agents recovered from the suspect who robbed the store.
     

    ChalupaCabras

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jan 30, 2009
    1,374
    48
    LaPorte / Kingsbury
    If he was sentenced to less than 20 years, then yes, under Indianas OLD penal laws, he could have been out in 8 years or less with good behavior.

    Old law says you got a 'day for a day' - basically, you were eligible for parole after 1/2 of your time had been served, and if your behavior was good then they usually granted it. Law was recently changed to a much higher percentage of time 75% or 85%, I forget which.

    So yes, basically, If he was sentenced to 10 or even 15 years for a negligent death or something, then he could have easily been out in time to do this robbery because he would have only been locked up 5 - 7 years for it under our old laws.
     

    Frost49

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 21, 2012
    163
    18
    Tim Buk 2
    This doesn't seem to be a 2A violation as the store owner states in the article. They aren't keeping him from bearing arms, they are just keeping his store inventory from him. What did he expect when he left that many guns and that much ammo in a trailer to be hooked up and driven away. It will remain "evidence" as long as the ATF wants it to be. Just my:twocents:
     

    Double T

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   1
    Aug 5, 2011
    5,955
    84
    Huntington
    This doesn't seem to be a 2A violation as the store owner states in the article. They aren't keeping him from bearing arms, they are just keeping his store inventory from him. What did he expect when he left that many guns and that much ammo in a trailer to be hooked up and driven away. It will remain "evidence" as long as the ATF wants it to be. Just my:twocents:

    the trailer was secure. Had security in place. Someone cut the multiple locks and stole the trailer. Will you be so callous if you were to leave a gun locked in your car, someone breaks the window, cuts the cable, and then steals the "safe" to work open later? I don't think so. The weapons, ammo, and suppressors were secure.
     

    Frost49

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 21, 2012
    163
    18
    Tim Buk 2
    As I said, my point of view. How they got stolen is a mute point anyway. The fact that he is claiming a 2A right violation in his court case is what my post should have included only. I understand it is not the ATF's property, but if the case is still "active" then the "evidence" isn't going to be released. If and when they take the thief to court, the evidence will be used I would guess. It would be no different from 1 gun being used in a shooting. You wouldn't get your firearm back until the case had been resolved either in a court case or cleared by the authorities.
     
    Top Bottom