NOT ME!! just getting that out of the way, LOL!
recently have read two separate stories in the paper of an intoxicated driver arrested and refusal to submit to blood/breath test's, both stories said a warrant was immediately issued for a blood draw and it was done without the person's "consent"
my understanding in INDIANA was you have the right to refuse the test but it was an automatic driver's license suspension and you wouldn't even be able to argue for work license. neither person i read about caused an accident, injured anyone (one guy was sleeping in his running car in park) but in both cases the police forced a blood draw to prove/disprove guilt.
I agree with the obvious, don't drive intoxicated and it won't be a problem, but i'm not sure why this practice is taking place. maybe i just need enlightening. both stories originated from porter county if that matters.
recently have read two separate stories in the paper of an intoxicated driver arrested and refusal to submit to blood/breath test's, both stories said a warrant was immediately issued for a blood draw and it was done without the person's "consent"
my understanding in INDIANA was you have the right to refuse the test but it was an automatic driver's license suspension and you wouldn't even be able to argue for work license. neither person i read about caused an accident, injured anyone (one guy was sleeping in his running car in park) but in both cases the police forced a blood draw to prove/disprove guilt.
I agree with the obvious, don't drive intoxicated and it won't be a problem, but i'm not sure why this practice is taking place. maybe i just need enlightening. both stories originated from porter county if that matters.